On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 01:58:11PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > I think we'd be better off to rename these to tsvector_delete()
> > and tsvector_filter() while we still can.
>
> ... although I now notice that hstore already exposes a function
> named delete(), so that ship may have sailed already. But I'm more
> troubled by filter() anyhow, since that keyword can appear in
> expressions --- it seems much more likely that that would pose a
> parsing conflict after future SQL extensions.
I suspect that steering that ship would be a good idea starting with
deprecation of the old name in 9.6, etc. hs_filter(), perhaps?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate