Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
| От | Alvaro Herrera | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20160328153843.GA750908@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) | 
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-03-28 15:46:43 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > @@ -932,8 +936,13 @@ ReadBuffer_common(SMgrRelation smgr, cha
> >  
> >      if (isLocalBuf)
> >      {
> > -        /* Only need to adjust flags */
> > -        bufHdr->flags |= BM_VALID;
> > +        /*
> > +         * Only need to adjust flags.  Since it's local buffer, there is no
> > +         * concurrency.  We assume read/write pair to be cheaper than atomic OR.
> > +         */
> > +        uint32 state = pg_atomic_read_u32(&bufHdr->state);
> > +        state |= BM_VALID;
> > +        pg_atomic_write_u32(&bufHdr->state, state);
> 
> I'm not a fan of repeating that comment in multiple places. Hm.
Perhaps a set of macros should be offered that do "read, set some flag,
write".  Then the comments can be attached to the macro instead of to
each callsite.
-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
		
	В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: