Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 2/5/16 10:08 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 06:02:57PM -0600, Jim Nasby wrote:
> >>I just discovered that ./configure will happily accept '--with-pgport=' (I
> >>was actually doing =$PGPORT, and didn't realize $PGPORT was empty). What you
> >>end up with is a compile error in guc.c, with no idea why it's broken. Any
> >>reason not to have configure or at least make puke if pgport isn't valid?
> >
> >That seems like a good idea.
>
> Patch attached. I've verified it with --with-pgport=, =0, =77777 and =1. It
> catches what you'd expect it to.
Does it work to specify port numbers below 1024?
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services