Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex
| От | Aleksander Alekseev |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20151211191441.3cc507b5@fujitsu обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex
Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello, Tom I see your point, but I would like to clarify a few things. 1. Do we consider described measurement method good enough to conclude that sometimes PostgreSQL really spends 3 ms in a spinlock (like a RTT between two Internet hosts in the same city)? If not, what method should be used to approve or disapprove this? 2. If we agree that PostgreSQL does sometimes spend 3 ms in a spinlock do we consider this a problem? 3. If we consider this a problem, what method is considered appropriate to find a real reason of such behaviour so we could fix it? Best regards, Aleksander
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: