On 2015-07-15 12:04:40 +0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
> > One thing worth mentioning is that arguably the problem is caused by the
> > fact that we're here emitting database level information in pg_dump,
> > normally only done for dumpall.
>
> ... the reason for which is probably the lack of CURRENT_DATABASE as a
> database specifier. It might make sense to add the rest of
> database-level information to pg_dump output, when we get that.
I'm not sure. I mean, it's not that an odd idea to assign a label to a
database and then restore data into it, and expect the explicitly
assigned label to survive. Not sure if there actually is a good
behaviour either way here :/