Re: BUG #13498: make check failures

On 2015-07-13 14:15:58 -0700, Pete Lancashire wrote:
> I'll agree to a point.
>
> I'll see what else I can find out. Is there an option to make the test more
> verbose ? And I'll see what I can get out of the what changes the
> optimization does
>
> Its a pitty, I'd love to get postgresql screaming on a P-series. In other
> things level 3 can increase the performance 20-30% and level 5 in one
> program that does a lot of array searching 50-70%

You could try with gcc -O3...