Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20150529224829.GC6535@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access
status of transaction 1
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-05-30 10:41:01 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > >> Just saw what looks like a report of this issue on 9.2. > >> > >> https://github.com/wal-e/wal-e/issues/177 > > > > Urk. That looks awfully similar, but I don't think any of the code > > that is affected here exists in 9.2, or that any of the fixes involved > > were back-patched to 9.2. So that might be something else altogether. > > Not only that, the pg_multixact/members *directory* is reported > missing, which is a different problem entirely. I don't read that from the log, what does make you think that that's the case. Afaics it's "just" the 0146 member file that is missing?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: