On 2015-05-29 14:15:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > On 2015-05-29 13:49:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Why can't the user stop it?
>
> > Because it makes a good amount of sense to have e.g. certificates not
> > owned by postgres and not writeable? You don't necessarily want to
> > symlink them somewhere else, because that makes moving clusters around
> > harder than when they're self contained.
>
> Meh. Well, I'm willing to yield on the EACCES point, but I still find
> the exclusion for ETXTBSY to be ugly and inappropriate.
Ok.