* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> writes:
> > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> Ooops. But shouldn't that have failed 100% of the time in a CCA build?
> >> Or is the candidates list fairly noncritical?
>
> > The candidates list is absolutely critical.
>
> Oh, I was confusing CCA with RELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE, which does something
> a bit different. I wonder whether we should get rid of that symbol and
> just drive the test in RelationClose off CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS.
> (Ditto for CATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE.) Or maybe make CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS
> #define the other two symbols.
Ah. Seems like that'd make sense to me, though I guess I'd prefer just
driving it all off of CCA.
Thanks!
Stephen