On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 09:15:49AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > It seems to me that waiting for 9.6 for what's arguably a bug fix is too
> > much. It's not like this is a new feature. Why don't we just make sure
> > it is as correct as possible and get it done for 9.5? It's not even in
> > beta yet, nor feature freeze.
>
> Well, I applied what I thought would work, but did not handle three
> cases:
>
> * checking of hasoids by index specifications
> * queries with multiple LIKE'ed tables
> * matching inheritance behavior
>
> I am unclear if I should be addressing such complex issues at this point
> in the development cycle. I can certainly apply this patch, but I need
> someone else to tell me it is good and should be applied. I am also
> thinking such review time would be better spent on patches submitted
> long before mine.
I have added regression tests to the patch, attached. I have included
Tom's test that doesn't directly use LIKE.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +