On 2015-04-23 23:08:34 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> The heapam API is not that stable, we've added arguments to those functions
> every once in a while, and I don't recall any complaints.
I heard some, but not too many, that's true. I know that I've written
code that'd be broken/needed even more ifdefs ;)
> That said, I'd actually like to see a separate heap_super_delete() function
> for that, rather than piggybacking on heap_delete(). It's a quite different
> operation. There'll be some duplication, but seems better than a maze of
> if-else's in heap_delete.
+many. I've requested that changes a couple times now.
Greetings,
Andres Freund