On 2014-09-18 13:44:47 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2014-09-18 13:40 GMT+02:00 Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>:
>
> > On 2014-09-17 22:17:22 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > > 2014-09-17 22:07 GMT+02:00 Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com>:
> > I fail to see why that is so much preferrable for you to passing
> > parameter to DO?
>
>
> > 1) You need to think about unique names for functions
> > 2) Doesn't work on HOT STANDBYs
> > 3) Causes noticeable amount of catalog bloat
> > 4) Is about a magnitude or two more expensive
> >
>
> 1. I am not against simple DO, what doesn't substitute functions
>
> 2. When DO have to substitute functions, then I don't see a benefits
>
> Show me real use case please?
Did you read what I wrote above? I'm sure you can rephrase them to be
more 'use case' like yourself.
Isn't being able to do this on a standby a fundamental enough advantage?
Being significantly cheaper? Needing fewer roundtrips?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services