Re: assertion failure 9.3.4

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephen Frost
Тема Re: assertion failure 9.3.4
Дата
Msg-id 20140421162333.GT2556@tamriel.snowman.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: assertion failure 9.3.4  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
* Josh Berkus (josh@agliodbs.com) wrote:
> 1) I've confirmed at the 2nd site that the issue doesn't happen if
> pg_stat_statements.so is not loaded.  So this seems to be confirmation
> that either auto_explain, pg_stat_statements, or both need to be loaded
> (but not necessarily created as extensions) in order to have the issue.

Interesting...

> 2) I've been unable to reproduce the issue using a naive test case, but
> I'll keep trying.

Thanks.

> 3) The XID information is interesting.
>
> a) I've confirmed that this is a case of having multiple row versions
> rather than allowing a duplicate PK to be inserted.
>
> b) the end result of this corruption is XIDs which go backwards:
>
>   xmin   |  xmax   |   ctid    | step_id | workitem_id | status
> ---------+---------+-----------+---------+-------------+---------
>  3362707 | 3362707 | (6177,31) |       1 |      446469 | pending
>  3362710 | 3362707 | (6177,32) |       1 |      446469 | working
>
>  5520953 | 5520953 | (5064,105) |       1 |      727946 | pending
>  5520954 | 5520953 | (5064,108) |       1 |      727946 | working
>
> What's additionally problematic is that the current snapshot minxid is
> in the 9000000 range, so it's not clear why any of the above rows are
> visible at all.

Can you get the infomask bits..?  What's does pg_controldata report wrt
the MultiXid's?
THanks,
    Stephen

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alfred Perlstein
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD