Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Дата
Msg-id 20140421154901.GF14024@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2014-04-21 11:45:49 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> That seems to make more sense. I can't imagine why this would be a runtime
> parameter as opposed to build time.

Because that implies that packagers and porters need to make that
decision. If it's a GUC people can benchmark it and decide.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD