On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 09:07:07PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > In the "INDEX" case, should the output mention specifically which index
> > is being considered?
>
> Ah, good idea. Updated patch attached. The output is now:
>
> test=> \d+ test
> Table "public.test"
> Column | Type | Modifiers | Storage | Stats target | Description
> --------+---------+-----------+---------+--------------+-------------
> x | integer | not null | plain | |
> Indexes:
> "test_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (x) REPLICA IDENTITY
> "i_test2" btree (x)
> --> Replica Identity: USING INDEX "test_pkey"
> Has OIDs: no
>
> However, now that I look at it, it seems redundant as REPLICA IDENTITY
> is already marked on the actual index. Ideas?
Hearing nothing, I have gone back to the previous patch that just marks
replica identity as USING INDEX; applied patch attached.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +