Bruce Momjian escribió:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 06:11:30PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On 18 March 2014 18:01, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 04:17:53PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > >> > While I am not a fan of backpatching, the fact we are ignoring errors in
> > >> > some critical cases seems the non-cosmetic parts should be backpatched.
> > >>
> > >> pg_resetxlog was not an offender here; its coding was sound.
> > >>
> > >> We shouldn't be discussing backpatching a patch that contains changes
> > >> to coding style.
> > >
> > > I was going to remove the coding style changes to pg_resetxlog from the
> > > backpatched portion.
> >
> > Why make style changes at all? A patch with no style changes would
> > mean backpatch and HEAD versions would be the same.
>
> The old style had errno set in two places in the loop, while the new
> style has it set in only one place.
I think it makes more sense to have all callsites look the same in all
supported branches.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services