On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 04:17:53PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > While I am not a fan of backpatching, the fact we are ignoring errors in
> > some critical cases seems the non-cosmetic parts should be backpatched.
>
> pg_resetxlog was not an offender here; its coding was sound.
>
> We shouldn't be discussing backpatching a patch that contains changes
> to coding style.
I was going to remove the coding style changes to pg_resetxlog from the
backpatched portion.
> ISTM we should change the code with missing checks to adopt the coding
> style of pg_resetxlog, not the other way around.
>
> I assume you or Kevin have this in hand and you don't want me to apply
> the patch? (Since it was originally my bug)
I know the email subject says pg_archivecleanup but the problem is all
over our code.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +