On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:27:28AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > But the other usages seem to be in assorted utilities, which
> > will need to do it right for themselves. initdb.c's walkdir() seems to
> > have it right and might be a reasonable model to follow. Or maybe we
> > should invent a frontend-friendly version of ReadDir() rather than
> > duplicating all the error checking code in ten-and-counting places?
>
> If there's enough uniformity in all of those places to make that
> feasible, it certainly seems wise to do it that way. I don't know if
> that's the case, though - e.g. maybe some callers want to exit and
> others do not. pg_resetxlog wants to exit; pg_archivecleanup and
> pg_standby most likely want to print an error and carry on.
I have developed the attached patch which fixes all cases where
readdir() wasn't checking for errno, and cleaned up the syntax in other
cases to be consistent.
While I am not a fan of backpatching, the fact we are ignoring errors in
some critical cases seems the non-cosmetic parts should be backpatched.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +