Re: branching for 9.2devel
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: branching for 9.2devel |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20137.1303763336@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: branching for 9.2devel (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: branching for 9.2devel
Re: branching for 9.2devel |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 04/25/2011 03:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> *Ouch*. Really? It's hard to believe that anyone would consider it
>> remotely usable for more than toy-sized projects, if you have to list
>> all the typedef names on the command line.
> Looks like BSD does the same. It's just that we hide it in pgindent:
Oh wow, I never noticed that. That's going to be a severe problem for
the "run it anywhere" goal. The typedefs list is already close to 32K,
and is not going anywhere but up. There are already platforms on which
a shell command line that long will fail, and I think once we break past
32K we might find it failing on even pretty popular ones.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: