Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO
Дата
Msg-id 20131211003444.GA2935@awork2.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO  (Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2013-12-04 05:39:23 -0200, Claudio Freire wrote:
> Problem is, Postgres relies on a working kernel cache for checkpoints.
> Checkpoint logic would have to be heavily reworked to account for an
> impaired kernel cache.

I don't think checkpoints are the critical problem with that, they are
nicely in the background and we could easily add sorting.

Rather I think it would be the writeout of a dirty victim buffer when
acquiring a new buffer.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: logical changeset generation v6.8