Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK
Дата
Msg-id 20131105202637.GG14819@awork2.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 2013-11-05 12:21:23 -0800, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
>
> > Looks fine to me
>
> Any thoughts on whether this should be back-patched to 9.3?  I can
> see arguments both ways, and don't have a particularly strong
> feeling one way or the other.

Hehe. I was wondering myself. I'd tentatively say no - unless we also
backpatch the debugging patch there doesn't seem to be good reason to
since the likelihood of conficts due to it doesn't seem very high.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Add cassert-only checks against unlocked use of relations