Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kevin Grittner
Тема Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK
Дата
Msg-id 1383688092.58848.YahooMailNeo@web162901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2013-11-05 12:21:23 -0800, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
>>
>>> Looks fine to me
>>
>> Any thoughts on whether this should be back-patched to 9.3?  I
>> can see arguments both ways, and don't have a particularly
>> strong feeling one way or the other.
>
> Hehe. I was wondering myself. I'd tentatively say no - unless we
> also backpatch the debugging patch there doesn't seem to be good
> reason to since the likelihood of conficts due to it doesn't seem
> very high.

Works for me.  Done.

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add cassert-only checks against unlocked use of relations
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add cassert-only checks against unlocked use of relations