Re: port _srv.o makefile rules don't observe dependency tracking
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: port _srv.o makefile rules don't observe dependency tracking |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20131.1335903907@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: port _srv.o makefile rules don't observe dependency tracking (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: port _srv.o makefile rules don't observe dependency tracking
Re: port _srv.o makefile rules don't observe dependency tracking |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mar may 01 15:30:25 -0400 2012:
>> Instead, I thought this could easily be fixed by writing this:
>>
>> %_srv.o: %.c %.o
>> $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(subst -DFRONTEND,, $(CPPFLAGS)) -c $< -o $@
>>
>> A bit hacky, but should get quite robust results.
> So basically to build the _srv.o file you first need to build the .o?
> Since both files need to be built anyway, I don't think this is a
> problem.
Are there, or might there be in the future, any "port" files that only
exist in server flavor and not client-side flavor? It doesn't seem
terribly unlikely to me. This is a cute hack but it assumes that
everything in that directory can and should be built both ways.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: