Re: Fix for pg_upgrade and invalid indexes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Bruce Momjian
Тема
Re: Fix for pg_upgrade and invalid indexes
Дата
Msg-id
20130330033513.GB12134@momjian.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Ignore invalid indexes in pg_dump. "anarazel@anarazel.de" <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Ignore invalid indexes in pg_dump. Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Ignore invalid indexes in pg_dump. Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Ignore invalid indexes in pg_dump. Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 07:03:05PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund  writes:
> > Those columns cannot be NULL, so using IS DISTINCT FROM seems a bit
> > clumsy.
> 
> That was what I started to write, too, but actually I think the IS
> DISTINCT is correct and the RIGHT JOIN should be a LEFT JOIN.  Note
> that the query appears to be intended to collect regular tables as
> well as indexes.  (As patched, that's totally broken, so I infer
> Bruce hasn't tested it yet.)

Yes, I only ran my simple tests so far --- I wanted to at least get some
eyes on it.  I was wondering if we ever need to use parentheses for
queries that mix normal and outer joins?  I am unclear on that.

Attached is a fixed patch that uses LEFT JOIN.  I went back and looked
at the patch that added this test and I think the patch is now complete.
I would like to apply it tomorrow/Saturday so it will be ready for
Monday's packaging, and get some buildfarm time on it.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian          http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Getting to 9.3 beta
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Getting to 9.3 beta
FAQ