Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve concurrency of foreign key locking
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve concurrency of foreign key locking |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20130123171516.GD7048@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve concurrency of foreign key locking (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve concurrency of foreign key locking
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve concurrency of foreign key locking |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-01-23 11:58:28 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 01/23/2013 10:12 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >Improve concurrency of foreign key locking
>
> This error message change looks rather odd, and has my head spinning a bit:
>
> - errmsg("SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE cannot be applied to
> the nullable side of an outer join")));
> + errmsg("SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE/KEY UPDATE/KEY SHARE
> cannot be applied to the nullable side of an outer join")))
>
> Can't we do better than that?
I don't really see how? I don't think listing only the current locklevel
really is an improvement and something like "SELECT ... FOR $locktype
cannot .." seem uncommon enough in pg error messages to be strange.
Now I aggree that listing all those locklevels isn't that nice, but I
don't really have a better idea.
Andres
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: