On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 05:47:14 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar ago 28 17:27:51 -0400 2012:
> >> Also, is there any reason to consider just moving those defs into
> >> heapam.h, instead of inventing a new header? I'm not sure if there's
> >> any principled distinction between heap.h and heapam.h, or any
> >> significant differences between their sets of consumers.
> >
> > [ yeah, there's quite a few files that would need heap.h but not heapam.h
> > ]
>
> OK, scratch that thought then. So we seem to be down to choosing a new
> name for what we're going to take out of htup.h. If you don't like
> heap.h, maybe something like heap_tuple.h? I'm not terribly excited
> about it either way though. Any other ideas out there?
htup_details.h? That doesn't have the sound of "fringe details" that
htup_private.h has.
Greetings,
Andres
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services