Re: splitting htup.h

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar ago 28 17:27:51 -0400 2012:
>> Also, is there any reason to consider just moving those defs into
>> heapam.h, instead of inventing a new header?  I'm not sure if there's
>> any principled distinction between heap.h and heapam.h, or any
>> significant differences between their sets of consumers.

> [ yeah, there's quite a few files that would need heap.h but not heapam.h ]

OK, scratch that thought then.  So we seem to be down to choosing a new
name for what we're going to take out of htup.h.  If you don't like
heap.h, maybe something like heap_tuple.h?  I'm not terribly excited
about it either way though.  Any other ideas out there?
        regards, tom lane