Hello Andreas,
thank you very much for the link.
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 13:04:30 +0100
> Von: lst_hoe02@kwsoft.de
> Zitat von Jan-Peter Seifert <Jan-Peter.Seifert@gmx.de>:
> > I wonder whether the number of connections is still limited on
> > Windows 64-bit if you also use a 64-bit version of PostgreSQL:
>
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Running_%26_Installing_PostgreSQL_On_Native_Windows#I_cannot_run_with_more_than_about_125_connections_at_once.2C_despite_having_capable_hardware
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/947246/en-us
So the default setting for Windows 7 64-Bit seems to be:
SharedSection=1024,20480,768
Makes me wonder whether PostgreSQL ( as a service ) still uses the 'Non-interactive desktop heap' for connections then.
I used pgbench for testing 500 connections ( max_connections set to 600 ):
Initialize:
pgbench -i -U postgres -h host -p port
Test:
pgbench -U postgres -h host -p port -c 500
Verify:
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM pg_stat_activity;
The non-interactive Desktop Heap has been increased by just a half - yet the number of connections can obviously be
muchhigher than 200. I guess the connections don't need less memory now though.
Do the services share the same desktop (heap) or does each (PostgreSQL) service has its own ( if I register each
servicefor a different Windows user?).
Thank you very much,
Peter
--
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de