Re: Too many WAL(s) despite low transaction

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephen Frost
Тема Re: Too many WAL(s) despite low transaction
Дата
Msg-id 20110403105251.GF4116@tamriel.snowman.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Too many WAL(s) despite low transaction  (Selva manickaraja <mavles78@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Too many WAL(s) despite low transaction
Список pgsql-admin
* Selva manickaraja (mavles78@gmail.com) wrote:
> Next actions to do:
>
>    1. Implement pg_compress, or pg_lesslog, pg_clearxlogtail
>    2. Check on how well autovacuum is running and how much to tune it.

Have you tested that you can do a restore using the base backup and
WALs?  Have you made sure the database is consistent/correct after doing
such a restore?  If you change to using pg_compress or anything else,
you should be sure to repeat that testing to make sure everything works
as expected.

    Thanks,

        Stephen

Вложения

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Selva manickaraja
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Too many WAL(s) despite low transaction
Следующее
От: Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Fedora core 10: tcpip_socket = True