Re: Should psql support URI syntax?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Adrian von Bidder
Тема Re: Should psql support URI syntax?
Дата
Msg-id 201104010916.18566@fortytwo.ch
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Should psql support URI syntax?  (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Should psql support URI syntax?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Heyho!

On Friday 01 April 2011 02.39:25 Christopher Browne wrote:
> An advantage to this uri form is that it allows applications to be
> configured uniformly - I do not need to ask "is this using libpq, needing
> one sort of configuration, or Java, needing another?"
>
> Rather, I may say, "here is a uri I may use with any of my applications"

Since URI stings are popular, it might really make sense if pg could
recommend a preferred form of postgres URI strings (and obviously implement
it in libpq).  For the non-libpq APIs (there's at least
http://python.projects.postgresql.org/, don't know about others), it would
still be just a recommendation that they could follow or not follow, so the
situation wouldn't change too much from today, I fear.

cheers
-- vbi


--
East Indians sometimes see Heaven as a giant bureaucracy, and frequently
report being sent back because of clerical errors.
<http://scienceblogs.com/cortex/2007/01/culture_and_neardeath_experien.php>

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Brendan Jurd
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Keywords in pg_hba.conf should be field-specific
Следующее
От: Noah Misch
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: maximum digits for NUMERIC