Re: Should psql support URI syntax?
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Should psql support URI syntax? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1301823154.5146.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Should psql support URI syntax? (Adrian von Bidder <avbidder@fortytwo.ch>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Should psql support URI syntax?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On fre, 2011-04-01 at 09:12 +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > Since URI stings are popular, it might really make sense if pg could > recommend a preferred form of postgres URI strings (and obviously > implement it in libpq). For the non-libpq APIs (there's at least > http://python.projects.postgresql.org/, don't know about others), it > would still be just a recommendation that they could follow or not > follow, so the situation wouldn't change too much from today, I fear. Well, there isn't any requirement that URIs be prot://hostname:port/something They just have to be prot:something So you could just turn the existing conninfo syntax into a URI by doing something like postgresql:dbname=foo%20hostname=bar
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: