Re: Too many WAL(s) despite low transaction

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephen Frost
Тема Re: Too many WAL(s) despite low transaction
Дата
Msg-id 20110401023555.GE4116@tamriel.snowman.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Too many WAL(s) despite low transaction  (Selva manickaraja <mavles78@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Too many WAL(s) despite low transaction
Список pgsql-admin
* Selva manickaraja (mavles78@gmail.com) wrote:
> Where you mentioned "after the reload" I suppose you meant restart right?

I'm not sure offhand if it requires a reload or a restart, that's why I
suggested doing a reload than then checking the logs to see if a restart
is required.

> About compressing you mentioned iirc, but how do I use it? are there any
> examples. I read about pg_compress before. Is that same?

No, I meant "use gzip".

> The configuration file shows that autovacuum=on and track_count=on to be
> commented out. That means that it is not running right? If that's the case,
> just uncommenting it now should get it working right?

Commented out means that the default value is used, which is on for both
of those.  That means that autovacuum should already be running.  Is
there some reason you think it isn't?

    Thanks,

        Stephen

Вложения

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Selva manickaraja
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Too many WAL(s) despite low transaction
Следующее
От: Selva manickaraja
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Too many WAL(s) despite low transaction