Re: work_mem / maintenance_work_mem maximums

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: work_mem / maintenance_work_mem maximums
Дата
Msg-id 201102201441.p1KEfn725347@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: work_mem / maintenance_work_mem maximums  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus wrote:
> 
> > Is this a TODO?  Can we easily fix the tuplesort.c code?
> 
> Easily, no.  But that's not a reason for it to not be a TODO.
> 
> I, too, would like to be able to make use of 32GB of work_mem effectively.

[ repost to the right thread.]

Well, I figure it will be hard to allow larger maximums, but can we make
the GUC variable maximums be more realistic?  Right now it is
MAX_KILOBYTES (INT_MAX).

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: using a lot of maintenance_work_mem
Следующее
От: Bernd Helmle
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: using a lot of maintenance_work_mem