hi,
> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>
>> might be unrelated to the loop problem, but...
>
> Aha! I think it *is* related. There were several places where data
> was uninitialized here; mostly because Dan was working on this piece
> while I was working on separate issues which added the new fields.
> I missed the interaction on integrating the two efforts. :-(
> The uninitialized fields could lead to all the symptoms you saw.
> I've reviewed, looking for other similar issues and didn't find any.
>
> Could you try the attached patch and see if this fixes the issues
> you've seen?
with your previous patch or not?
YAMAMOTO Takashi
>
> -Kevin