Re: Problem with high OIDs because of changed atol behaviour

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jan-Peter Seifert
Тема Re: Problem with high OIDs because of changed atol behaviour
Дата
Msg-id 20110131154824.261280@gmx.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Problem with high OIDs because of changed atol behaviour  (Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-odbc
Hello Inoue-san,

sorry for asking again.

So will there be an official patch for this problem?

Could you tell me, please?

Thank you very much in advance,

Peter

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:18:19 +0900
> Von: Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp>
> An: Jan-Peter Seifert <Jan-Peter.Seifert@gmx.de>
> CC: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
> Betreff: Re: [ODBC] Problem with high OIDs because of changed atol behaviour

> Hi,
>
> (2011/01/15 0:00), Jan-Peter Seifert wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > we ran into a problem because a Windows 32 bit application is looking
> for rows within the tables of pg_catalog via OID - using psqlODBC (32 bit).
> > As OIDs are unsigned they can be of higher value than INT_MAX. However,
> OIDs greater than INT_MAX seem to be getting clamped to INT_MAX:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-admin/2011-01/msg00003.php
> >
> > The problem still persists in psqlodbc 09.00.0200.
> >
> > We had a look at the sources of v08.04.0200 to get a clue:
> >
> > convert.c:
> >
> > /*
> > *       Macros for unsigned long handling.
> > */
> > #ifdef WIN32
> > #define         ATOI32U       atol
> > #elif   defined(HAVE_STRTOUL)
> > #define         ATOI32U(val)          strtoul(val, NULL, 10)
> > #else /* HAVE_STRTOUL */
> > #define         ATOI32U       atol
> > #endif /* WIN32 */
> >
> >
> > /*
> > *       Macros for BIGINT handling.
> > */
> > #ifdef ODBCINT64
> > #ifdef WIN32
> > #define         ATOI64         _atoi64
> > #define         ATOI64U       _atoi64
> > #define         FORMATI64   "%I64d"
> > #define         FORMATI64U "%I64u"
> > #elif   (SIZEOF_LONG == 8)
> > …
> >
> > It seems that as of Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 values exceeding the
> positive integer limit let atol return LONG_MAX and values exceeding the
> negative integer limit let atol return LONG_MIN.
> > In case of these overflows errno is set to ERANGE. If the parameter that
> has been passed is NULL, the invalid parameter handler is being invoked -
> as described in parameter validation.
> > If resuming of execution is allowed these functions set errno to EINVAL
> and return 0.
> >
> > In Microsoft Visual C++ 2003 (and earlier versions) there was no such
> error handling of these overflows.
> >
> > We suggest some changes within convert.c that might solve this problem:
> >
> > /*
> > *       Macros for unsigned long handling.
> > */
> > #ifdef WIN32
> > #define         ATOI32U(val)          strtoul(val, NULL, 10)
> > #elif   defined(HAVE_STRTOUL)
> > #define         ATOI32U(val)          strtoul(val, NULL, 10)
> > #else /* HAVE_STRTOUL */
> > #define         ATOI32U       atol
> > #endif /* WIN32 */
> >
> >
> > /*
> > *       Macros for BIGINT handling.
> > */
> > #ifdef ODBCINT64
> > #ifdef WIN32
> > #define         ATOI64(val)  _strtoi64(val, NULL, 10)
> > #define         ATOI64U(val) _strtoui64(val, NULL, 10)
> > #define         FORMATI64   "%I64d"
> > #define         FORMATI64U "%I64u"
> > #elif   (SIZEOF_LONG == 8)
> > …
> >
> > Could look into this, please?
>
> Thanks for your investigation.
> I would take of it.
>
> regards,
> Hiroshi Inoue

--
Neu: GMX De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief!
Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren: http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/demail

В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Andrus Moor"
Дата:
Сообщение: 09.00.0100 does not return data, 08.03.0400 causes exception Out of memory while reading tuples
Следующее
От: Heine Ferreira
Дата:
Сообщение: driver and server questions