Re: DELETE with LIMIT (or my first hack)

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tis, 2010-11-30 at 14:20 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > I agree, that argument is completely misconceived. If the DBA is
> > paying enough attention to use LIMIT, s/he should be paying enough
> > attention not to do damage in the first place. If that were the only
> > argument in its favor I'd be completely against the feature.
> 
> I don't have any use for DELETE with LIMIT, but UPDATE with LIMIT could
> be very useful if you are doing full-table updates and you don't have
> enough space so you do it in chunks.

So should this now be a TODO item?  Text?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +