Re: two different posgres t for Rails development?
| От | Adrian Klaver |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: two different posgres t for Rails development? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 201008281325.07958.adrian.klaver@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: two different posgres t for Rails development? (Rich Shepard <rshepard@appl-ecosys.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Saturday 28 August 2010 12:50:32 pm Rich Shepard wrote: > On Sat, 28 Aug 2010, John R Pierce wrote: > > does Rails even let you near the SQL? I thought it had a total ORM > > abstraction layer that assumes all databases are more or less MySQL, and > > it didn't let you anywhere near the actual relational aspects. > > According to my software engineer partner, you're correct. It doesn't > use SQL, but it's own embedded language. And, while postgres can be used, > he prefers mysql and that's directly supported by Rails. > > Rich It uses SQL to do the actual communication with the db. That is hidden behind Ruby(http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/) for programming and YAML(http://www.yaml.org/) for configuration. FYI Postgres is one of the three suggested databases to use: http://guides.rubyonrails.org/getting_started.html -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@gmail.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: