Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of lun ago 23 14:55:55 -0400 2010:
> 
> > OK, I have attached a proposed patch to improve this.  I moved the
> > pg_clog mention to a new paragraph and linked it to the reason the
> > default is relatively low.
> > 
> > Comments?
> 
> I think the new para doesn't make much sense, in context.  Why does it
> say "freeze"?  How can we expect users to understand how that is
> related to this parameter?

I have removed the freeze mention per Tom's comment and posted an
updated version that removes the 'freeze' wording.  Are there other
changes needed?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +