On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:12:12PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
>
> > Median may be useful, but we pretty much can't just call it
> > "median." Instead, we need to call it something like "left_median"
> > or "arithmetic_median."
>
> I think it would be reasonable, and perhaps preferable, to use just
> "median" for the semantics described in most dictionaries -- for
> example, this:
>
> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/median
>
> If you do a google search for "median" and poke around, you'll find
> many places where this is the only definition mentioned; the others
> seem to be rather infrequently used. Why not make the commone usage
> convenient?
The reason not to is the same reason that MEDIAN doesn't appear in the
SQL standard, namely that what's common in one field is wrong in
another.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate