Markus Wanner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 08/09/2010 06:10 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > My point is that you can treat malloc the same as "add shared memory",
> > to some extent, with the same limiations.
>
> Once one of the SLRU buffers is full, it cannot currently allocate from
> another SLRU buffer's unused memory area. That memory there is plain
> wasted at that moment. That's my point and the problem the allocator I
> posted tries to solve.
>
> I fail to see how malloc could help here. malloc() only allocates
> process-local memory.
My point is that we have the same limitations with malloc()/threads, as
we have with shared memory.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +