От: Janning Vygen
Тема: Re: Write performance
Дата: ,
Msg-id: 201006241545.31749.vygen@kicktipp.de
(см: обсуждение, исходный текст)
Ответ на: Re: Write performance  (Janning)
Ответы: Re: Write performance  (Jesper Krogh)
Список: pgsql-performance

Скрыть дерево обсуждения

Write performance  (Janning, )
 Re: Write performance  (Kenneth Marshall, )
  Re: Write performance  (Janning, )
 Re: Write performance  (Matthew Wakeling, )
  Re: Write performance  (Janning, )
   Re: Write performance  (Janning Vygen, )
    Re: Write performance  (Jesper Krogh, )
   Re: Write performance  (Scott Carey, )
 Re: Write performance  (Greg Smith, )

On Thursday 24 June 2010 15:16:05 Janning wrote:
> On Thursday 24 June 2010 14:53:57 Matthew Wakeling wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, Janning wrote:
> > > We have a 12 GB RAM machine with intel i7-975 and using
> > > 3 disks "Seagate Barracuda 7200.11, ST31500341AS (1.5 TB)"
> > >
> > For each drive, you will be able to read/write approximately 8kB /
> > 0.0085s, giving 941kB per second. If you have multiple processes all
> > doing random access, then you may be able to utilise both discs and get
> > double that.
>
> So with your calculation I have a maximum of 2MB/s random access. So i
> really need to upgrade my disk configuration!

i was looking at tomshardware.com and the fastest disk is

   Maxtor Atlas 15K II * 8K147S0,SAS,147 GB, 16 MB Cache,15000 rpm

with 5.5 ms random access time.

So even if i switch to those disks i can only reach a perfomace gain of 1.5,
right?

To achieve a better disk performance by factor of ten, i need a raid-10 setup
with 12 disks (so i have 6 raid-1 bundles). Or are there other factors with
high end disks?

kind regards
Janning



В списке pgsql-performance по дате сообщения:

От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache
От: Craig James
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: requested shared memory size overflows size_t