Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 201006041633.23343.andres@anarazel.de обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL
Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Friday 04 June 2010 16:25:30 Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > > On Friday 04 June 2010 14:17:35 Jon Schewe wrote: > >> XFS (logbufs=8): ~4 hours to finish > >> ext4: ~1 hour 50 minutes to finish > >> ext3: 15 minutes to finish > >> ext3 on LVM: 15 minutes to finish > > > > My guess is that some of the difference comes from barrier differences. > > ext4 uses barriers by default, ext3 does not. > Or, to put it more clearly: the reason ext3 is fast is that it's unsafe. Jon: To verify you can enable it via the barrier=1 option during mounting.. Andres
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: