Peter Headland wrote:
> In respect of Bruce's proposed changes, I prefer the original wording
> (for the same reasons as Tom), but with the addition of the mention of
> the server - "... read from or written to a file directly by the
> server".
OK, done with the attached patch.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Index: doc/src/sgml/ref/copy.sgml
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ref/copy.sgml,v
retrieving revision 1.94
diff -c -c -r1.94 copy.sgml
*** doc/src/sgml/ref/copy.sgml 23 Feb 2010 05:17:33 -0000 1.94
--- doc/src/sgml/ref/copy.sgml 23 Feb 2010 21:38:07 -0000
***************
*** 1,5 ****
<!--
! $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ref/copy.sgml,v 1.94 2010/02/23 05:17:33 momjian Exp $
PostgreSQL documentation
-->
--- 1,5 ----
<!--
! $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ref/copy.sgml,v 1.93 2010/02/17 04:19:39 tgl Exp $
PostgreSQL documentation
-->
***************
*** 367,376 ****
</para>
<para>
! <command>COPY</command> always processes data according to the
! current client encoding, even if the data does not pass through
! the client but is read from or written to a file directly by the
! server.
</para>
<para>
--- 367,376 ----
</para>
<para>
! Input data is interpreted according to the current client encoding,
! and output data is encoded in the the current client encoding, even
! if the data does not pass through the client but is read from or
! written to a file directly by the server.
</para>
<para>