Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Mihamina Rakotomandimby
Тема Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project
Дата
Msg-id 20091221095441.282240d7@pbmiha.malagasy.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project  ("Gauthier, Dave" <dave.gauthier@intel.com>)
Ответы Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project  (Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@killerbytes.com>)
Список pgsql-general
> "Gauthier, Dave" <dave.gauthier@intel.com> :
> Again, the audience is managers.  Is there an
> impartial,  3rd party evaluation of the 2 DBs out there that
> identifies PG as being more reliable?  It might mention things like
> fewer incidences of corrupt tables/indexes, fewer deamon crashes,
> better recovery after system crashes, etc... ?


I dont know if it's a plus or a minus, but:
http://www.google.com/search?&q=save+mysql+oracle

--
       Architecte Informatique chez Blueline/Gulfsat:
    Administration Systeme, Recherche & Developpement
                +261 34 29 155 34 / +261 33 11 207 36

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project
Следующее
От: Mihamina Rakotomandimby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Server Requirements