* Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Petr Jelinek<pjmodos@pjmodos.net> wrote:
> > The docs are not complete but that's up to Stephen, otherwise the patch
> > should be finished. But I am not the reviewer :)
>
> Well, perhaps we had better prod Stephen then, since complete docs are
> a requirement for commit.
I didn't think the docs posted were terrible, but I am working on
improving them.
> > Anyway, while this patch might not necessary get commited in this commit
> > fest, I'd still like to have opinion from one of the commiters on "the VIEW
> > problem" which also affects grant on all patch ( see
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg00957.php ) and I
> > fear "returned with feedback" might prevent that until next commit fest.
>
> OK, hopefully one of them will chime in with an opinion. As I say, I
> would like to see this get committed if it's done, I just wasn't sure
> it was. But now it seems that was due to insufficiently careful
> reading of the thread, with the exception of this issue and the need
> to finish the docs.
Working on it... Not that we've never committed stuff with less than
complete docs before.. ;)
Thanks,
Stephen