Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] [libpq] rework sigpipe-handling macros

Hi Robert,

> Perhaps we should use macros.

I was trying to avoid macros, as this means we lose type- and syntax- 
checking at the call-site, and end up with slightly messier code. 
However, I understand that this is probably personal preference for me 
:)

How about just 'static' functions? (ie, drop the 'inline'). This way, 
the compiler is free to inline where suitable, and non-inlining 
compilers will do the right thing too.

However, I'd rather make decisions on data, rather than guessing. Is the 
actual problem here that some compilers just don't support the 'inline' 
keyword?

Cheers,


Jeremy