Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] [libpq] rework sigpipe-handling macros

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeremy Kerr
Тема Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] [libpq] rework sigpipe-handling macros
Дата
Msg-id 200907151042.07891.jk@ozlabs.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] [libpq] rework sigpipe-handling macros  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] [libpq] rework sigpipe-handling macros  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi, Alvaro,

> Does this work in compilers other than GCC?  I think we use some
> kludges to protect against them ... see pg_list.h for the canonical
> example.

As I understand it, we're not using static inlines in pg_list.h to 
prevent multiple objects from exporting the same symbols if the 
functions don't end up as 'static inline' (ie, because the compiler 
doesn't support that).

In this case, we're only compiling the inlines into a single object, so 
even if the compiler doesn't support inlines, we'll just end up with 
out-of-line function calls, which should work too.

However, this is only my assumption about those compilers (I don't have 
access to other compilers to test); happy to fix these up if the inlines 
won't work.

Cheers,


Jeremy


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Glen Parker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: more than one index in a single heap pass?
Следующее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Index-only scans