On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 02:01:26PM -0700, David Wheeler wrote:
> On Jun 30, 2009, at 1:40 PM, David Fetter wrote:
>
>>> Yes, that's my ideal, but Tom says I need to write C code to get that
>>> information from RECORD objects, alas. :-(
>>
>> Would this be the first C piece? If not, it might be worth doing.
>
> I don't understand the question.
I was thinking of this as part of PgTAP.
> But yes, I think it'd be worth doing. I'd like to have functions
> like:
>
> pg_record_attrs(RECORD) RETURNS SETOF regtype[]
>
> And maybe another function to return attribute names. If it could
> returns both names and types, that'd be cool, but I'm not sure what kind
> of data type that would be.
It's possible to have it return SETOF RECORD with OUT parameters, I
think.
> Does this sound interesting to other folks?
Sure. Maybe that should go in pg_catalog in 8.5...
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate