Re: search_path vs extensions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: search_path vs extensions
Дата
Msg-id 200905291308.15564.peter_e@gmx.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: search_path vs extensions  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Ответы Re: search_path vs extensions  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thursday 28 May 2009 02:57:00 Josh Berkus wrote:
> Personally, if we're tracking stuff through special dependancies which
> pg_dump will be aware of anyway, I don't see why extension objects
> should go into a special schema.

But they clearly have to go into *some* schema, and it would add some clarity 
to the world if we made a recommendation which one that is.  Which is what 
some of the subproposals really come down to.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Python 3.0 does not work with PL/Python
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: search_path vs extensions