Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > It would be nice to know if we are ever going to set
> > standard_conforming_strings to on.
>
> My personal bias is to go to the standard behavior as the default at
> some point. For legacy reasons, I don't know that you would ever want
> to remove the setting; especially since I don't think it adds much
> code if you're going to support the E'...' literals. The ugliest
> thing about this GUC is that it adds some complications to the flex
> code, but it doesn't seem that bad to me.
Agreed, we would probably never remove standard_conforming_strings.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +